# Stationary Normal Shock Waves

Shock-waves are a common topic covered in undergraduate thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and gas dynamics courses. Because shock-waves are awesome, I figured I would do one of my first posts on their basic theory. I’m going to try to cover the topic by first providing some context and a clear picture of what a shock wave is (and why it forms)… followed by how we analyze it. I try to include general features of shockwaves and the things that are particularly “important to know” … selon moi.

## Contents

Here are the sections you’ll find in this post:

- Introduction to the normal shock
- Simple example: shock-wave in diverging nozzle

- Analysis of the normal shock
- Important properties of a normal shock
- Conclusions and Useful References

## Introduction to the stationary normal shock

So first, what is a shock wave? Well, in order to understand this, you must first recall that in supersonic flow the flow is moving faster than the speed of sound. Also, recall that the speed of sound is the speed at which information is transmitted throughout the continuum. Thus, if you are a small person riding along a fluid particle that is supersonic, neither you nor the fluid particle you are hitching a ride on can see what is coming up ahead of you. There is no mechanism for you to see what is ahead and gradually slow down or correct course. You are now committed to a sudden, discontinuous change resulting in an increase in pressure and temperature, and a loss of speed. So, basically the idea of shockwaves is this: they are a discontinuity that forms in order for the flow to meet some downstream condition. If a supersonic flow never encounters something downstream, like an obstacle or a back pressure, it will never shock. And likewise, a subsonic flow can never form a shock wave (unless it is first accelerated to supersonic somewhere within the flow field). In subsonic flows, downstream obstacles and pressures are communicated upstream at a speed that allows for the curving of streamlines and/or deceleration. You can observe this by picturing the streamlines around an airfoil that curve around its shape but never contact it.

#### Simple example of a shock-wave

Let’s look at (probably) the most common learning example: a shockwave forming in a supersonic nozzle.

In Figure 1 we see the classic nozzle example. Hopefully this example is not extremely new to you. The main concept is this: When the back pressure is high enough, the flow through the nozzle never goes supersonic (including at the throat) and is simply compressed to the throat and then expanded in the diverging section (and in these cases Pe=Pb). These are the cases shown by **Region a** in the figure. When the back pressure (Pb) is low enough that the flow in the nozzle throat is choked (Mach 1 is achieved) there are now two possible solutions. The first solution is the subsonic solution. Here, the flow decelerates from Mach 1 to the exit and flow exits at M<1. The second solution is the supersonic solution. Here, the flow continues to accelerate and exits at M>1. So, which solution is the right solution? From the graph in Figure 1, you can probably guess… the back pressure! When Pb is equal the supersonic back pressure, the flow will obey the supersonic solution. And similarly, when Pb is equal to the subsonic back pressure the flow will remain subsonic.

But, what if the back pressure is somewhere in-between? The back pressure is too high for the supersonic solution… but too low for the subsonic solution? This situation is what exists in **Region b**. This is where the concept of the shockwave is really apparent. When the back pressure is in this region, the flow starts out by accelerating to supersonic after the nozzle throat. Once the flow is supersonic, *it cannot receive any communication from the flow ahead of it.* Why? Because (again) communication between fluid particles is at the speed of sound! So here we have a fluid particle being accelerated in a diverging section, with a downstream boundary condition that it cannot meet (because it can’t see it coming). So, what happens? A normal shock is produced at some point in the diverging section of the nozzle. The resulting scenarios are shown in the next figure.

Fig 2 shows what happens in Region b. As the back pressure is increased, the shock-wave that is formed moves upstream and is formed earlier in the nozzle. This continues until Pe=Pb(subsonic) and the shock disappears. *Can you have a shock in the converging section? *No. Not unless you had supersonic flow in the converging section in the first place.

Because I love CFD… To illustrate this example I have simulated it using OpenFOAM and the solver rhoCentralFoam (hopefully I’ll write post about it’s setup at some point). As you can see the flow accelerates from the reservoir (through the converging-diverging nozzle) but due to the back pressure, a shock-wave forms in the diverging section.

## Analysis of Normal Shock-waves

So how do we analyze a shockwave? Well, normal shock waves are a one-dimensional, adiabatic, discontinuous phenomena that are governed by the equations of fluid mechanics (conservation of mass, momentum and energy). Thus, it makes sense that we simply analyze them with a 1D control volume analysis. We will have an inlet (side 1) and an outlet (side 2) and in between is the (practically) discontinuous normal shock wave.

The governing equations for the control volume above are:

Conservation of mass:

Conservation of momentum:

Conservation of energy:

Perfect gas equation of state assuming constant specific heats:

and

With the above equations the problem is fully defined. It is then just a matter of an exercise in algebra. From various combinations of the above equations (its worth it to derive them yourself at some point… especially if you are studying for a PhD candidacy) the normal shock relations are obtained.

The normal shock relations are defined here:

- Temperature Ratio:

- Pressure Ratio:

- Density and velocity ratio:

- Stagnation Pressure Ratio:

- Post-shock Mach number:

## Properties of the Normal Shock

There is lots to know about shock-waves, but here is a summary of what I think is important to know and what sticks out in my mind. Hopefully I’m not missing anything… but I can always add stuff later!

**Normal shock-waves obey conservation of mass, momentum, and energy, AND the 2nd law of thermodynamics.**It may seem obvious but it should be re-stated. A shock-wave obeys the usual laws of fluid mechanics.**Shock-waves are adiabatic.**By this I mean to say that when we analyze the control volume shown in Figure 3, Energy in=Energy out.- When you have a perfect gas with constant specific heats
**stagnation temperature does not change across the shock.**Sometimes students forget this and it’s quite important. This is really an extension of the last point. Note: As stated, when the gas does not have constant specific heats, energy is still conserved but the stagnation temperature across the shock will change. **Stagnation pressure always decreases across a shock.****The Mach number always decreases across a shock.**Additionally, for a normal shock the post-shock Mach number is always*subsonic.*However as you will see later if I make a post on oblique shocks, the post-shock Mach number can remain supersonic.

## Conclusions and Useful References

Well I hope you found this post helpful! … And not confusing. As usual if someone spots a mistake or something I missed then I would very much appreciate a comment and I will fix it. I am not perfect obviously, and this is both an exercise in sharing knowledge, but an exercise in strengthening and confirming knowledge through the act of sharing… or something like that.

There is no shortage of books that cover normal shocks. But I have found that not all are created equal. These are the books that I are always sitting on my desk and have great sections covering this topic:

[1] Anderson, J. D. (1990). *Modern compressible flow: with historical perspective* (Vol. 12). McGraw-Hill.

[2] John, J. E. A., & Keith, T, G. (2006) *Gas Dynamics, *3rd Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall

[3] Çengel, Y. A., & Boles, M. A. (2015). *Thermodynamics: an engineering approach*. M. Kanoğlu (Ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

[4] Zucrow, M. J., & Hoffman, J. D. (1976). Gas dynamics. *New York: Wiley, 1976*, *1*.

Categories

Thank you for the helpful post! Is there a typo of the subscript in the mass conservation equation?

nice post..ii helped me

Nice post! Very pedagogical! By the way, did you write on the OpenFoam simulation setup?